Yesterday, the House of Representatives voted 238-187 to
amend the 2001 USA Patriot Act by removing a provision that allowed the FBI to obtain library and bookstore records with an order from a secret surveillance court (where a lower standard of proof is utilized than in criminal courts.) The amended legislation means that law enforcement agencies would have to obtain standard search warrants and/or grand jury subpoenas in order to access information about a suspected terrorists reading habits.
The Bush administration continues to insist that the provision is vital to the fight against terrorism, saying it "provides national security investigators with an important tool for investigating and intercepting terrorism while at the same time establishing robust safeguards to protect law-abiding Americans."
Supporters of the amendment (which the ACLU called a "rare victory for civil liberties") claim that it "simply restores the checks and balances that protect innocent Americans under the Constitution."
For me, I think Rep. Nadler (D-NY) said it best: "If some terrorist checks out a book about how to make an atomic bomb, that might be legitimate for the government to know, and they can get a search warrant or a subpoena the way we've done it throughout American history. Otherwise, what you're reading is none of the government's business."
President Bush has threatened to veto any legislation that would weaken the powers of the original Patriot Act.