Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Time for Withdrawal?

I have always been one to worry about a premature withdrawal from Iraq. While I have strong negative feelings about how and why the Bush Administration took us to war, I feel that we have to remain long enough to ensure that a power vacuum isn't created that would be filled by another dictatorial leader or an absence of all power, leading to an Afghanistan-style non-state (or quasi-state) that provides an open training ground for terrorists. Thus, Congressman Murtha's (D-Pa) recent call for a timetable for troop withdrawals left me torn. Murtha is a hawk and a big military supporter in Congress, who was a decorated Marine veteran of Vietnam. He has always supported the President on Iraq. But that has changed. If Murtha is calling for withdrawal, might there be some merit to it? I was especially interested in his idea that by not providing a timetable, we give the Iraqis no incentive to "do for themselves". Why do the fighting and dying if someone else will do it for you?

Now, the Bush Administration responded by attacking Murtha, even going so far as to have their surrogates call him a coward. That's right, they called a decorated Marine who received a Purple Heart in Vietnam a coward. One surrogate did it on the floor of the House of Representatives. I was, and am, disgusted by how low the Bush Administration and its surrogate attack dogs will sink to attack a political opponent. (Of course, responding the resulting outrage, the Vice President quickly gave a speech in which he praised Murtha's service and bravery, stated that there is always room for debate on the critical issues of our time - and then savaged all the Admin's opponents as trying to rewrite history).

That aside, my worries about a premature withdrawal and the potential nightmares it could bring about persisted to a point where I was forced to admit to myself that I still disagreed with Congressman Murtha and many within the Democratic Party. However, today a story came out in the Washington Post stating that Iraqi leaders themselves have joined forces and called for a withdrawal timetable.

If the Iraqis themselves, Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds, all want a withdrawal by the end of next year, isn't it something we should strongly consider? They obviously think they will be ready and this is the elected government now. If the very people who will "be at the mercy" of insurgent forces and the potential resulting chaos or dictatorial/terrorist takeover, think they will be ready to proceed and withstand those forces on their own, shouldn't we work towards the withdrawal they are requesting?

I think so.

5 Comments:

At 22/11/05 2:35 PM, Blogger ze roberto said...

I, too, have struggled with the question of imposing a timeline for troop withdrawal. And was equally thrown to see the article in today's Post detailing this new call for a timeline from a coalition of Iraqi leaders. (Although, I must say, I was more surprised by how they chose to address the insurgency in their official statement. But that may be a whole other conversation.) I agree with you, Pete. If the Iraqis themselves are saying they want foreign troops out by EOY 2006, if they feel they'll be prepared by then, then how can we not comply? After all, if our intention was to truly establish a new, sovereign democracy in Iraq, then shouldn't we have to respect their decisions? If we say, "no, we know better, you won't be ready by then," isn't that kind of like teaching your son to drive, giving him the keys to the car, and then telling him that he can't use it? I think the administration is going to have to think carefully about how they respond to this. In my mind, to deny the Iraqi's request, would totally undermine the already thin justification for going in there in the first place. It wasn't for WMDs, we know that. So, if it's not to establish democracy and let the Iraqis function as such, why *are* we there?

 
At 22/11/05 5:32 PM, Blogger Sean said...

It's beyond time for the Administration to a) announce a withdrawal timeline, b) enumerate conditions for said withdrawal, and c) begin re-alinging its diplomatic and geo-political mechanisms towards US force withdrawal -- complete withdrawal. With proper (and real) UN support, our withdrawal need not incite civil war. And fear of a civil war shouldn't prevent us from moving towards withdrawal.

 
At 23/11/05 10:44 AM, Blogger Pete said...

Here's an article about the congresswoman who called Congressman Murtha a coward on the floor of the House. Sorry I don't know how to get the link thing to work in comments. Copy and paste, my friends, its worth the read.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/22/AR2005112201699.html

 
At 23/11/05 9:08 PM, Blogger Josh Glover said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 23/11/05 9:11 PM, Blogger Josh Glover said...

Pete, Harris, and Sean have stated my opinion better than I ever could, so I will just leave it at, "I agree!" :)

Pete, to make a link in the comments, just put <a href="http://www.whatever.com/link/to/page.html"> before the text you want to link, and </a> after it. e.g., if you write:

<a href="http://www.cnn.com">CNN sez</a>

it will look like this in the resulting comment:

CNN sez

 

Post a Comment

<< Home